?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I'm a woman, and I've edited Wikipedia

The New York Times has an article about how only about 13% of Wikipedia contributors are female.

That's a little concerning, considering the fact that Wikipedia is supposed to be the "sum of all human knowledge". The article has several examples of articles where women might have more knowledge about the topics, they're important topics, but the articles are lacking in substance and content.

I actually ran into a discussion about this on the user talk page for Jimbo Wales a few weeks ago, if you can believe it. There was a big debate about it, with all the things you might see... people asking why it mattered if women were contributing or not, people suggesting that Wikipedia needs an easier user interface so it's not so intimidating for new people.

General note: I do not think Wikipedia needs an easier user interface. From the Geocities pages of old to MySpace pages and blogs of the modern age, plenty of women have proven that we can learn markup tags.

In my experience though, people tend to do things their friends are doing. Women tend to get into things they see other women doing... in fact we tend to dominate social networks. So maybe women just don't see their girlfriends on Wikipedia enough? Or maybe no one's invited us to the projects, so we get that sense that we're not islands, we're contributing to something big?

Once I got started on Wikipedia I really liked editing. I found it easiest to get involved in local stuff... articles about my state, city, neighborhood. Those are topics I'm familiar with, but they're not all that fleshed out yet.

I also just liked reading up on topics I enjoyed, and filling in red links. It was easy to create new pages once I had my feet wet editing paragraphs on bigger articles.

Are my contributions perfect, with rock-solid references and links to every possible related page? No. Do I contribute every day, or every month? No. But it's not about that, I see Wikipedia as a "beating the curve" sort of thing. Write articles that are better than other articles. Make improvements, even if they're small. Do something small. It's so much easier than running a blog or web page, where you have do make consistent good updates all the time... it's low-maintenance. It's great.

I don't have a magic answer for the Wikimedia Foundation on how to get more women to contribute. But I can say to anyone reading this that it's a good thing to do... and most people who read my blog are women. So readers, bring your "crumb to the table". When you post an update to twitter or your blog or a forum, you're contributing. A piece of yourself and your words are out there for someone else to learn from. Wikipedia is the same idea, only I'd say it's even more important because it's Wikipedia. Go for it, ladies. Be bold.

--Spacefem (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Tags:

Comments

( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
mrs_dragon
Feb. 11th, 2011 02:06 am (UTC)
Funny you should mention that. I love Wiki because it is such a great resource. But I see it like a really great reference book, it never crosses my mind to browse it like a magazine or add to it like a blog. Though clearly, people can and do do both of those things.
deana_in_texas
Feb. 11th, 2011 05:07 am (UTC)
I love reading Wikipedia, and often do the "random page" thing for a while just reading stuff. A (male) friend of mine has done quite a lot of editing and often complains about the other editors being jerks and causing drama. I think it's the other editors I find intimidating. Definitely not the markup language :P
spacefem
Feb. 11th, 2011 01:34 pm (UTC)
I tried to edit a math article once and had my changes rolled straight back for no good reason. There were even other people agreeing with me on the talk page. I just decided to let it go and find another article.

You know what'd be nice... a "This article is dominated by jerks" tag that you can put up on an article so well-meaning newbies don't try to edit it!

Maybe getting more women on wikipedia would help with the "get more nice people who make compromises" on wikipedia movement.
secretsoflife
Feb. 11th, 2011 02:53 pm (UTC)
wanna crosspost this to geekfeminism.org? :)
spacefem
Feb. 11th, 2011 11:30 pm (UTC)
ooh totally! what should I do, want me to post it or someone else?
secretsoflife
Feb. 12th, 2011 02:03 am (UTC)
send me a bio and i'll post it under our guest post ID :)
spacefem
Feb. 12th, 2011 02:56 am (UTC)
just say: Spacefem is an electrical engineer who has a little extra time to run a feminist forum, write php scripts, and fly small airplanes.
secretsoflife
Feb. 12th, 2011 02:04 am (UTC)
oh um email is leigh at hypatia dot ca :)
astrogeek01
Feb. 11th, 2011 04:35 pm (UTC)
I'm totally guilty about not doing anything to contribute. I even saw a small error the other day and didn't bother to fix it...but I was like "I really should read it more closely, and it's a quote so I probably should be absolutely sure before I edit it" and...well, other things took priority. But really, it was probably just a typo.
motorharp
Feb. 11th, 2011 04:55 pm (UTC)
Thanks so much for posting this; I've wanted to help edit wikipedia, but wasn't sure the best way to start. These are good tips.
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

January 2018
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow